Cumbrian railways unite against “destructive” bridge scheme

Highways England move to bury the Great Musgrave railway bridge and block the future chances of the Eden Valley railway once again running the route.

Supporters of two heritage railways in Cumbria have been lobbying council officials and their local MP over the infilling of a bridge that is needed for a planned link between their lines.

In a statement released by The HRE Group that states:

Last Monday (24 May), contractors engaged by Highways England moved onto a site at Great Musgrave to start burying the 159-year-old structure which was designed by prolific Victorian engineer Thomas Bouch.

The Eden Valley and Stainmore railways have a long-standing ambition to reunite their operations by laying five miles of track from Kirkby Stephen to Warcop, creating a tourist attraction that would deliver a significant boost to the area. However loss of the bridge would place a substantial obstacle in their way, putting the connection in jeopardy after years of development work.

Highways England manages the Historical Railways Estate of 3,100 disused structures on the Department for Transport’s behalf. In a letter sent on 23 April 2020, they told Eden District Council that an “assessment undertaken in 1998 found the structure suitable only for 17 tonnes” and action was needed to “remove the associated risk of structural collapse and harm to the public”.

Normally, a project of this type would require planning permission as it constitutes an engineering activity and affects the external appearance of the bridge. However, just a day after receiving the letter, a Council officer told Highways England’s agent that “we don’t consider that we would need to see a planning application for these works”.

Mike Thompson, Project Manager for the Stainmore Railway Company, said: “It’s inexplicable that such a destructive project is allowed to go ahead without proper public scrutiny. There are huge potential economic benefits from an 11-mile line through the wonderful landscape of the Eden Valley, linking Kirkby Stephen to Warcop and then on to Appleby.

“Anything that prejudices that opportunity needs to be properly examined through the established democratic process, particularly a bridge infilling scheme that can’t be justified on engineering or public safety grounds.

“We urge the Council to put right their mistake and take immediate action to stop the work.”

In a statement, an officer from the Eden Valley Railway Trust, said: “We oppose the actions of Highways England in filling in the bridge without contacting interested parties and would have expressed our opposition to the idea. The Eden Valley Railway Trust’s long-term aim is to reinstate the line from Warcop to Kirkby Stephen and this has not changed since it was ratified by the members of the Trust back in 1999.”

The work at Great Musgrave is expected to cost £124K and take up to five weeks. In a statement, Highways England said “Infill or demolition is only considered on structures that are unsafe”. However locals point out that the bridge is on a lightly-used road, remains in good condition and is showing no signs of being overloaded.

Phil Dew, who chairs the Upper Eden Railway Heritage Partnership, said: “Quite rightly, the railways’ volunteers feel deeply let down by the Council. Years of hard work is under threat because the nature and impact of this scheme was not reviewed with due diligence.

“Was the Council’s policy on the fragmentation of green infrastructure networks considered? Was the Council’s policy on development that would prevent the future opening of a railway considered? Was the long-term economic impact of this work considered? Absolutely not. It’s a reprehensible and damaging error.

“Highways England sent the same template letter about infilling schemes to a number of local authorities last year and we have more than a dozen replies in which they are told to apply for planning permission. But Eden District Council just allowed them to go ahead. I’ve been alerting officers to the issue since January, but they’ve been indifferent and dismissive from the outset.”

Following an appeal on Facebook, the Bank Holiday weekend saw the railways’ volunteers and supporters lobby Dr Neil Hudson, the MP for Penrith and The Border, and Jason Gooding, Eden District Council’s Acting Chief Executive, urging them to save the bridge.

On a personal point on this issue adding to the above from the HRE Group

I have publicly expressed my own concerns and objections to the actions by Highways England and the implications for any chance of the line ever reopening with such obstructions in place.

Having had a lot of emails and messages for other local residents and groups both local and national over the implications of the works and having seen emails between Eden council planning and the contractors from April 2020 were the council said they had no issues with the works and no planning was required in their view.

I have spoken with Eden planning directly on this issue and today had an update that the council is reviewing the works and have asked Highways England to halt pending the review of the works.

Highways England have apparently refused to halt the works and claimed it falls under permitted works by them as the highways authority.

The works under way having seen the safety report on the bridge appear to not be required given the bridge was quoted in the safety report as "no significant risk" and the same report incorrectly states that no future plans or proposals that the works would impact exist.

Given a local railway group hopes to re-establish the line the works would impact this and also go against national planning policy and that of the Eden local plan that state works must not impact future rail or road development through development or works to a site.

The question of why Highways England are doing this with old railway structures and more importantly how they can ignore a request to halt works by the local planning authority must be answered alongside the protection of this and other railway infrastructure.

update:

After the above blog was published Eden council have now responded with a public statement on the issue and points raised above.

https://www.eden.gov.uk/your-council/news/media-releases/council-statement-bridge-at-great-musgrave/